|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
敦煌文献中の三一権実論争関係資料=Controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle Theories in Dunhuang Manuscripts |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
小野嶋祥雄 (著)=Onoshima, Sachio (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021.03.25 |
|---|
| ページ | 663 - 668 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 三一権実論争; 空有の論争; 敦煌文献; 『一乗仏性究竟論』; 曇曠; 道氤; 良賁 |
|---|
| 抄録 | It has been pointed out that there is a problem in the framework of intellectual history regarding the Three and One Vehicle theories presented by Tokiwa Daijo 常盤大定, which describes that Chinese controversy by focusing on the controversy between Tokuitsu 徳一and Saichō 最澄 in Japan.
In this paper, in an attempt to revisit the historical framework of the controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle theories presented by Tokiwa, I examine the controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle Theories in Dunhuang manuscripts, and show that in the early Tang period: (1) Dunhuang manuscripts contain fragments of the Yisheng foxing jiujing lun 一乗仏性究竟論 by Fabao 法宝; (2) descriptions in the Dunhuang manuscripts related to the controversy between the Three Vehicle and One Vehicle theories fall under the influence of Daoyin 道氤 (668–740), who was influenced by Chinese Yogācāra and emphasized the One Vehicle theory; (3) discussions on the debate regarding emptiness and existence (空有諍論) in Dunhuang show a different aspect than the development of the debate in Japan. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 663
二 敦煌文献中の法宝撰『一乗仏性究竟論』663
三 敦煌文献中の三一権実論争関係資料の特色 665
四 敦煌における「空有の論争」の独自展開 666
結語 667 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_663 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 76 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.10.07 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
