|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Kotyk, Jeffrey (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
対法雑誌=Journal of Abhidharma Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.2 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021 |
|---|
| ページ | 101 - 108 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 対法雑誌刊行会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://sites.google.com/view/journalofabhidharmastudies
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 神奈川, 日本 [Kanagawa, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 宿曜経; 宇宙論; 俱舎論; 天文学; 九執暦 |
|---|
| 抄録 | Chinese Buddhists adopted Indian cosmology based on Mount Sumeru and the Four Continents, which differed from native Chinese models. The four continents (Jambūdvīpa, Pūrvavideha, Avaragodānīya, and Uttarakuru) are positioned on a flat disc-shaped world. This was a type of flat earth cosmology that was documented in Abhidharma literature. The Buddhist canon does not mention a spherical earth, but Chinese monks were actually aware of an alternative cosmological model based on a spherical earth framework through the Jiuzhi li 九執曆 , a manual of Indian astronomy which was translated by Gautama Siddha in 718. This text introduced into Chinese the first instance of the concept of latitude (Skt. sva-deśa-akṣa). This sort of scientific theory based on a spherical earth model was already known by the mid-Tang. The Xiuyao jing 宿曜經 , compiled by Amoghavajra (705–774) in 759 with a subsequent revision in 764, not only adopts the cosmology outlined in Abhidharma texts, but also cites the Jiuzhi li. The issue at hand is why Amoghavajra and also the astronomer Yixing (673–727) never adopted cosmology based on a spherical earth. The present study will address these points. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに
漢訳アビダルマ文献における宇宙論と「惑星」の問題
『九執暦』の宇宙論
『宿曜経』の宇宙論と『九執暦』
結論
略号一覧
参照文献一覧
一次資料
|
|---|
| ISSN | 24355674 (P); 24355682 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.34501/abhidharmastudies.2.0_101 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 140 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.11.18 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.11.18 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
