|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
『論註』二種法身説の背景となった経論について=The Sūtras and Treatises Used as Background for the Concept of the Two Kinds of Dharma-Body in Tanluan’s Commentary on the Treatise on the Pure Land |
|
|
|
著者 |
宇野惠教 (著)=Uno, Ekyo (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.70 n.1 (總號=n.155) |
出版年月日 | 2021.12.20 |
ページ | 57 - 62 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
キーワード | 『論註』; 二種法身説; 『注維摩』; 由生由出; 方便 |
抄録 | In Tanluanʼs Commentary on the Treatise on the Pure Land浄土論註, we find a passage quoted from Sengzhaoʼs Commentary on the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa 注維摩経. It is applied to the background of the concept of ʻthe two kinds of dharma-body.’ This concept consists of the following five ideas: 1. Buddhas and Bodhisattvas; 2. Buddhaʼs Dharma-nature and Bodhisattvas’ expedient means for saving beings; 3. The two kinds of Dharma-Body (Buddhaʼs Dharma-Body as dharma-nature and Bodhisattvas’ Dharma-Body as expedient means) originate in each other; 4. The inexpressible aspect of Buddhaʼs reality and expressible aspect of Bodhisattvas’ expedients interact with each other; 5. The two kinds of Dharma-Body are to be identified as ‘Dharma.’
In Sengzhaoʼs Commentary on the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa, we find expressions similar to the usage of the above-stated notions in 1, 2, and 3. The notion stated in 5 can be seen in the same commentary and in the Great Significance of the Mahāyāna大乗大義章. As for 4, no source can be located for this idea. |
目次 | 一 従来の諸学説 57 二 『大論』の二身説の検討 58 三 『大乗大義章』の法身説の影響について 58 四 瑜伽行派の三身説の影響とみる説に対する批判 59 五 法性を観る智慧と方便の関係 59 六 『論註』二種法身説に直接影響を与えた典籍 60 七 残された問題 62 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.1_57 |
ヒット数 | 83 |
作成日 | 2023.01.04 |
更新日期 | 2023.01.04 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|