|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Introductory Part of Udayana’s Critique of the Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Chakrabarti, Kisor (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Religions
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.13 n.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2022.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 12 |
|---|
| 出版者 | MDIP |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.mdpi.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Basel, Switzerland [巴塞爾, 瑞士] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | 1. Author Affiliation: Institute of Cross Cultural Studies and Academic Exchange, Elon, NC 27244, USA.
2. Religions 2022, 13(3), 241. |
|---|
| キーワード | constant change; permanence; causal condition; Buddhism; Nyaya |
|---|
| 抄録 | In the Buddhist view, all real things are subject to constant change, and nothing real endures for more than one moment. The Buddhist holds that only causally productive things are real and offers arguments to prove that anything that produces an effect must undergo immediate change and cannot be permanent. In his Ātmatattvaviveka (ATV), Udayana (a Nyaya philosopher of the 11th century) raises objections to Buddhist arguments and tries to show that a causal condition can endure through time. Moreover, although a causal condition may have the ability to produce an effect, the production of an effect may be delayed until all other causal conditions are available; during this time, a causal condition may continue to exist and remain unchanged. I explain Udayana’s critique of the Buddhist position with the help of selections from the Sanskrit text. I translate the selected texts into English with notes and provide expository comments. (Diacritical marks are omitted from names). |
|---|
| 目次 | Abstract 1
Keywords 1
1. Introduction 1
2. The Main Buddhist Argument 2
3. Critique of the Argument 4
4. Summary 10
5. Conclusions 11
Notes 11
References 12
|
|---|
| ISSN | 20771444 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.3390/rel13030241 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 46 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.09.26 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.09.26 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
