|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abhidharma in early Mahayana |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Bronkhorst, Johannes
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
불교와 사회=佛教與社會=The Journal of Buddhism and Society
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.4 n.0 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2012 |
|---|
| ページ | 279 - 306 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 중앙승가대학교 불교학연구원 |
|---|
| 出版地 | Gimpo, Korea [金浦市, 韓國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | 저자정보: 라이덴 대학에서 박사학위를 받았으며，현재 스위스 로잔대학교(Lausanne Univ.)의 명 예교수이다. |
|---|
| 抄録 | There is a growing tendency among scholars to discard questions about the (single) origin of Mahayana as inappropriate. Schopen (1975: 181 [52]) was perhaps the first to surest a multiple origin, offering “the assumption that since each [Mahayana] text placed itself at the center of its own cult, early Mahayana (from a sociological point of view), rather than being an identifiable single group, was in the beginning a loose federation of a number of distinct though related cults, all of the same pattern, but each associated with its specific text” He was soon followed by Harrison (1978: 35), who observed that Mahayana “was from the outset undeniably multi-faceted.” Some thirty years after his first assumption, Schopen stated again (2004: 492): “it has become increasingly clear that Mahayana Buddhism was never one thing, but rather, it seems, a loosely bound bundle of many, and … could contain contradictions or at least antipodal elements.” Silk (2002: 371) reminds us that “various early Mahayana sutras express somewhat, and sometimes radically, different points of view, and often seem to have been written in response to diverse stimuli.
|
|---|
| ISSN | 20929277 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.33521/jbs.2012.4.0.279 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 135 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.12.24 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.12.24 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
