 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
袾宏における浄穢取捨の議論：華厳諸師との相違をめぐって=Zhuhong’s Ideas on Purity and Filth and Acceptance or Rejection: Differences with Other Huayan Masters |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
苑克柱 (著)=Yuan, Kezhu (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.71 n.2 (總號=n.159) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2023.03.22 |
|---|
| ページ | 725 - 722 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 袾宏; 浄穢取捨; 宗密; 李通玄 |
|---|
| 抄録 | The doctrinal basis of the Pure land teaching of Zhuhong lay in the Huayan School, a fact long known to scholars. Previous studies have tended to investigate doctrinal inheritances from Huayan masters such as Chengguan and Zongmi, and consequently their differences have been covered. This paper suggests that there is a gap regarding ideas of purity and filth and acceptance or rejection between these Huayan masters and Zhuhong. The former are based on Huayan ideas of inherent awakening and Yogācāra ideas of the Pure Land. Zhuhong emphasized the Yogācāra Pure Land which was based on the idea of the real existence of Amitābha’s land, and thus we can point out that a real gap exists between the two kinds of ideas. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1．問題の所在 725
2．袾宏と華厳諸師との相違 725
3．結論 722
〈参考文献〉 722 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.2_725 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 7 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2024.10.25 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.30 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
