勝喜《入中論釋疏》注釋風格之考察 -- 以《入中論釋疏》 ad. 《入中論注》VI vers. 22-33為主=The Approach of Jayānanda's Annotation and Commentaries Characteristics on vers. 22-33 in the Sixth Chapter of Madhyamakāvatāra-tīkā
本論文指在考察勝喜（Jayānanda）的《入中論釋疏》一書之注釋特色。勝喜是印度史上，對月稱（Candrakīrti, ca.530-600）的《入中論注》（Madhyamakāvatāra-bhāsya），唯一作有注釋文獻的人（《入中論釋疏》現存只有藏譯本）。他大約活耀於月稱之後五百年，也就是12世紀，傳統上將他歸屬於月稱系統，即歸謬論證派Prāsangika，《入中論釋疏》（Madhyamakāvatāra-tīkā）是他最主要的著作。本論文將特別以《入中論釋疏》中對《入中論注》VI vers. 22-33之注釋內容分析為主。以其中若干重要詞語為線索，透過與他同派系且時代相近（11世紀）的智作慧（Prajnākaramati, ca. 950-1030）之著作《入菩提行論細疏》（Bodhicaryāvatāra-panjikā）的比較分析，企圖闡明勝喜（Jayānanda）的注釋風格與其思想特色。 abstract This paper aims to examine the characteristics of Jayānanda’s commentary, especially focus in his Madhyamakāvatāra-tīkā ad. Candrakīrti’s Madhyamakāvatāra-bhāsya VI vers. 22-33. In the history of India, Jayānanda is the only one who annotated to Candrakīrti (ca.530-600)’s Madhyamakāvatāra-bhāsya extant today (Tibetan translation). He is active in about five hundred years after Candrakīrti, the 12th century, is considered to belong to the system of Candrakīrti (i.e. Prāsangika). Madhyamakāvatāra-tīkā is his most important writings. This paper will base on the annotation of Madhyamakāvatāra-tīkā VI vers. 22-33, compare and analyze a number of important words in Bodhicaryāvatāra-panjikā which was written by Prajnākaramati (ca. 950-1030) who belongs to the same system (i.e. Prāsangika) and similar times, to explore Jayānanda’s comment style and ideological characteristics.
