This paper deals with the logic process of Monk Chao′s philosophy of Buddhism in four aspects. First, as the thinking of having and non-having is constructed on the basis of philosophical concept of "being" and attempts to make an adjustment on ′right′ or ′wrong′ and ′true′′ or ′false′ of affairs, Monk Chao refuted the above thinking holding that if not introspecting the thinking train of "being", it was unable to ascertain the recognition of the Mahayana Buddhism on "true". Second, through the criticism on related thinking of "being", Monk Chao′s philosophy of Buddhism enables the view of the concept of "being true" of the Mahayana Buddhism to be highlighted. Third, with the help of the argumentation in the Madhyamaka Shastra, Monk Chao recognized that the "true" concept of the Mahaprajna-paramita-sutra was related to the theory of "empty", thus realizing the dialectical reversal of "true" "empty". Fourth, through the confirmation of "true" of the Mahaprajna-paramita-sutra and the appearance of the presentation of "thusness", the "enlightenment" advocated by Mahayana became ripe in logic and religious pathos accordingly.
