網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
Gushan Zhiyuan: Interpreting the Buddha-Nature of Insentient Beings through the Notions of Mind-Inclusion and Mind-Contemplation=孤山智圓:從心具和觀心的向度詮釋無情佛性思想
作者 釋見額=Shuman Chen
出處題名 禪與人類文明研究=International Journal for the Study of Chan Buddhism and Human Civilization
卷期n.1
出版日期2016.12.01
頁次83 - 112
出版者香港中文大學禪與人類文明研究中心
出版者網址 http://cbhc.crs.cuhk.edu.hk/main2/
出版地香港, 中國 [Hong Kong, China]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言英文=English
關鍵詞Buddha-nature=佛性; mind-inclusion=心具; matter-inclusion=色具; mind-contemplation=觀心; three thousand=三千
摘要Using textual analysis, this paper examines Gushan Zhiyuan’s interpretation of the Buddha-nature of insentient beings. In the Jin’gangpi xianxing lu, a commentary on Zhanran’s Jin’gangpi, Zhiyuan deems the concepts of inclusion and contemplation, closely associated with the mind, as prerequisites for justifying the Buddha-nature of insentient beings. The mind, as an agent, possesses and includes all the three thousand dharmas; the mind, as a thinking being, can contemplate its own three thousand dharmas of/in/as one moment of thought. Because all dharmas are included in the all-pervasive minds of sentient beings who have Buddha-nature, it is valid to suggest that insentient beings also have Buddha-nature.
Zhiyuan, however, underscores that insentient beings per se cannot engage in spiritual practice or attain Buddhahood because they have no minds. This view of Zhiyuan’s, I argue, contradicts Zhanran’s philosophy, for Zhanran does imply in the Jin’gangpi that insentient beings can attain Buddhahood. I suggest that, by considering the Buddha-nature of insentient beings completely contingent on the mind, Zhiyuan, to some extent, denies their Buddha-nature. This paper challenges Zhiyuan’s implication that sentient beings’ Buddha-nature possesses insentient beings, which differs from Zhanran’s assertion that insentient beings themselves really possess Buddha-nature.

本文採用文本分析的方法,旨在探討宋朝天台宗學人孤山智圓對於「無情佛性思想」的觀點與詮釋方法。在他的〈金剛錍顯性錄〉裏,智圓指出唯有透過「心具」和「觀心」這二個向度,才能正確瞭解湛然所提出的無情佛性思想。智圓認為,心是一切之主,心具三千諸法,眾生因為有心故能思慮,故能思惟己之一念三千。因為萬法皆含具在眾生之心中,又因為眾生有佛性,所以吾人才能說無情萬法也有佛性。然而,智圓進一步強調因為無情無心,所以無情本身並沒有能力修行,無法成就佛道。筆者認為,智圓這個看法有違湛然的本意,因為湛然在他的〈金剛錍〉一文中,明確提出無情也能成就佛道的論點。筆者認為,如果吾人一味地從「心」的角度來闡釋無情佛性思想,就某種程度而言,等於否定無情也有佛性。本文即試圖證明智圓的論點猶如在闡揚「眾生的佛性有無情」,和湛然的「無情有佛性」的觀點大相逕庭。
目次Introduction 85
Mind-Inclusion 90
Objection to Matter-Inclusion 96
Mind-Contemplation 103
Conclusion 110
ISSN25196111 (P)
點閱次數369
建檔日期2018.10.02
更新日期2024.04.23










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
578350

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽