佛教「念死」之修持：以《菩提道次第廣論》與《印光法師文鈔》為主之比較研究=Comparative Study Between Tsong-ka-pa's Lam Rim Chen Mo and Literatures of Master Yin-Guang on the Practice of Buddhist Teaching of death
宗喀巴=Tsong –kha- pa; 印光=Yin-guang; 《菩提道次第廣論》=Lam Rim Chen Mo; 《印光法師文鈔》=Literatures of Ven.Yin-Guang; 念死修持; 道次第=sequential Path of Bodhi; 念佛=read the Buddha's name; 漢藏佛學比較研究=A Comparative Study of Chinese and Tibetan Buddhism
Purpose of this paper is intended to Tsong-kha-pa's Lam Rim Chen Mo and imprinted Ven.Yin-guang's Literatures of Ven.Yin-guang, a comparative study of the idea of death related to practice the theories and methods of sequential Path of Bodhi. Two masters of the era distance of about half a century, belong to the important thinking of the Tibetan and Chinese Buddhism. They pay attention to "the subject of death", and to develop further studies to guide its associated professor, in addition to the actual practices of caring outside the same topic. This theroy focuses on some parts of particular, first of all, how to operate the "read dead" practices during which "What is the common objective characteristics and different ideas." Sescondly, by the theory of Buddhism and traditional classics as obviouss, what are the "dead idea" ideas, concepts, methods, object background concepts, consistency and inherited association. Thirdly, even by the correspondence of different space-time background, how the the development of a difference, ideological characteristics is appeard. Therefore, this theory will follow three aspects: First, the traceability of the Buddhist thought of "practice of the idea of dead"; the second is related to ideological position in the above two works; and the final is the theory of self-cultivation practices and sequential construction of the comparison. The Lam Rim Chen Mo combined the sequential Path of Bodhi and the motivation of "reading the impermanence of dead", as the entrance of Mahāyāna Bodhi Path. It is an operation of practice to think of dead. The Literatures of Ven.Yin-guang is a combination of reading the Buddha's name, with emphasis on "dead idea" as the basic position taken heart Buddha, emphasizing the context in order to enhance the belief and vows. This contribution also emphasize the uaual pratice, sick and dying pratice for entering into Pure Land. Both systems carry out the practice of actual practices for different boot methods: one emphasized the pratice in the corrupt world to become a Buddha, the other is to be reborn in the Pure Land. However, equally the self-cultivation is in order to "read the death" as a common starting point. This is a common basis, namely that fastening both of these two works to the department of "liberating rebirth" as the goal. The idea that the monk can expect to face, thinking of the end of life and the self-cultivation as a starting point for Buddhist practice, is a common point of view of two masters. As for the dissimilarity between the two works, there is no conflict or contradiction mutual rejection. On the contrary, for practitioners who are eager to be reborn in Pure Land should understand the Lamrim's sequentinal Path of Bodhi, and to the practitioners of operating the sequential Path of Bodhi who, need to combine the mind practice of tri-purusa-paths and the aspiration of being reborn in Pure Land. If it is so, they may be easily interated to each other. According to the contents of Lam Rim Chen Mo and Literatures of Ven.Yin-guang,different master has different associated sent
