 |
|
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Lele, Amod
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
Journal of Buddhist Ethics
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.26 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2019 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 239 - 289 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
https://history.la.psu.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | University Park, PA, US |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 附註項 | Author affiliation: Boston University |
|---|
| 摘要 | Contemporary engaged Buddhist scholars typically claim either that Buddhism always endorsed social activism, or that its non-endorsement of such activism represented an unwitting lack of progress. This article examines several classical South Asian Buddhist texts that explicitly reject social and political activism. These texts argue for this rejection on the grounds that the most important sources of suffering are not something that activism can fix, and that political involvement interferes with the tranquility required for liberation. The article then examines the history of engaged Buddhism in order to identify why this rejection of activism has not yet been taken sufficiently seriously. |
|---|
| 目次 | Introduction 240
Engaged Buddhist Scholarship and the Buddhist Past 244
Method in Buddhist Ethics 250
Is Engagement a Duty? 255
Arguments Against Engagement: Where Does Suffering Come From? 258
The Cakkavatti-Sīhanāda Sutta: Detachment from the Passage of Time 261
Arguments Against Engagement: The Harshness of Politics 265
Western Engaged Buddhist Presuppositions 268
Responses to Disengaged Buddhism 278
Conclusion 282
Abbreviations (primary works cited) 283
Other Works Cited 284 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 127 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2021.03.01 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
