라뜨나끼르띠=Ratnakrti; 즈냐냐스리미뜨라=Jānasrmitra; 쁘라즈냐까라굽타=Prajākaragupta; 다르마끼르띠=Dharmakrti; 디그나가=Dignāga; 바짜스빠띠미스라=Vācaspatimira; 바사르바즈냐=Bhāsarvaja; 뜨릴로짜나=Trilocana; 샹까라=Śaṅkara; ﹤﹤찰나설멸증﹥﹥=Kaabhagasiddhi; ﹤﹤찰나설설품﹥﹥=kaabhagdhyya; 후기유가행파; 나야야 학파; 실재; 찰나설=the theory of momentariness
摘要
Ratnakīrti’s Kṣaṇabhaṅgasiddhi‐Anvayātmikā (KSA) is an essential work to understand Indian logic and ontology.It is not difficult to find that this work has many arguments between the Naiyāyikas and the Kṣaṇabhaṅgavādins.In numerous cases, Ratnakīrti presents the thoughts of his preceding Buddhist and Hindu philosophers in their own words on the topic under discussion and discusses them in his own way.The aim of this paper is to uncover the position of Ratnakīrti in Indian philosophical systems by way of investigating the background of each argument in the KSA.This explicates the followings: 1) Succeeding the lineage of Dignāga, Dharmakīrti, Prajñākaragupta, and Jñānasrīmitra, which is the main stream of the school of Kṣaṇabhaṅgavādins, Ratnakīrti continues the Buddhist Pramāṇa tradition in the 11th century in India; 2) Refuting the criticisms by the Naiyāyikas, such as Śaṅkara, Trilocana, Bhāsarvajña, and Vācaspatimiśra, he proves the fundamental doctrines of Buddhism like the theory of momentariness (kṣaṇikatva).
目次
1. 서론 211 2. ﹤﹤찰나멸논증﹥﹥과 그 판본 212 3. ﹤﹤찰나설논증﹥﹥에 나타난 인용 출처 214 3.1 니야야 논사들부터의 인용 출처 215 3.2 후기 유가행파 논사들로부터의 인용 출처 217 4. 결론 221
