 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
讃岐公日源写本『立正安国論』に関する一考察=A Study of the Risshō Ankoku Ron Manuscripts by Sanukikō-Nichigen |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
本間俊文 (著)=Honma, Shunbun (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.66 n.1 (總號=n.143) |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2017.12.20 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 200 - 205 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | 立正安国論; 日蓮; 日源; 訓点; 貞和本 |
|---|
| 摘要 | This paper represents an attempt to clarify the philological position of two Risshō Ankoku Ron manuscripts (Kenmu-Bon and Jōwa-Bon Manuscripts) of Sanukikō-Nichigen (讃岐公日源) in the history of Nichiren-shu literature from the bibliographical stand point.
The study confirms that both the Kenmu-Bon (建武本) and Jōwa-Bon (貞和本) manuscripts are descendants of the Ryaku-hon (略本) Manuscript, which now belongs to Nakayama Hokekyōji temple (中山法華経寺). The study also points out these facts of bibliographical significance: the characteristic usage of guiding marks for reading (訓点) of those two manuscripts respectively represents that the guiding marks in the former manuscript were added in the beginning of the early modern period while those of the latter were added based on the manuscript which was copied by Nissai (日済) in the Kamakura period. These newly found bibliographical facts strongly support the assumptions of previous studies and make clearer the philological position of these two manuscripts. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一 はじめに 200
二 日源写本の形態 201
三 日源写本の系統 201
四 日源写本にみえる奥書・識語・訓点の関係 201
五 おわりに 205 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.66.1_200 |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 70 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2022.07.27 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.07.27 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
