網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
無自性性論証を行う際のバーヴィヴェーカとカマラシーラの立場について:無原因から生起しないことの論証を中心に=The Standpoint of Bhāviveka and Kamalaśīla in Proving Absence of Self-nature: Focusing on the Proof of Being not from no Cause
作者 林玄海 (著)=Hayashi, Genkai (au.)
出處題名 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
卷期v.67 n.1 (總號=n.146)
出版日期2018.12.20
頁次390 - 387
出版者日本印度学仏教学会
出版者網址 http://www.jaibs.jp/
出版地東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言日文=Japanese
關鍵詞カマラシーラ; バーヴィヴェーカ; 無原因
摘要Previous researches have pointed out that Kamalaśīla, a Mādhyamika, engages the criticism of the inference system of Bhāviveka, and defends Bhāviveka. Because of this, it can be said that when Kamalaśīla proves the absence of Self-nature, his standpoint is basically the same as that of Bhāviveka. However, is this true? I consider the point through the proof of being not from no cause.

Candrakīrti criticizes Bhāviveka’s explanation of ahetu as *kuhetu. Kamalaśīla does not defend Bhāviveka on this point, and Kamalaśīla himself does not explain ahetu as *kuhetu. Because of this, Kamalaśīla does not explain ahetu as *kuhetu as does Bhāviveka, and in regard to this point, Kamalaśīla does not always hold the same standpoint as does Bhāviveka.
目次はじめに 390
1. 先行研究の指摘 390
2. バーヴィヴェーカの「無原因」とそれに対するチャンドラキールティ の批判 389
3. 「無原因」におけるカマラシーラの態度 389
おわりに 388
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.67.1_390
點閱次數120
建檔日期2022.08.11
更新日期2022.08.11










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
647169

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽