網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
『五蘊論釈』の法処所摂色におけるスティラマティの註釈態度について=Sthiramati’s Commentary on the Content of Dharmāyatana in the Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā
作者 清水尚史 (著)=Shimizu, Naofumi (au.)
出處題名 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
卷期v.68 n.1 (總號=n.149)
出版日期2019.12.20
頁次390 - 387
出版者日本印度学仏教学会
出版者網址 http://www.jaibs.jp/
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言日文=Japanese
關鍵詞安慧; スティラマティ; 五蘊論釈; 法処所摂色
摘要This essay studies Sthiramati’s view of dharmāyatana in the Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā (PSkV). Sthiramati accepts five types of dharmāyatana, just as does Asaṅga in the Abhidharmasamuccaya (AS). However, Vasubandhu explains only avijñapti in the Pañcaskandhaka (PSk). The five types of dharmāyatana are ābhisaṅkṣepika, ābhyavakāśika, sāmādānika, parikalpita, and vaibhūtvika. Among them, sāmādānika corresponds to avijñapti. Sthiramati commented on why the four types were not mentioned in PSk. First, Sthiramati commented that ābhisaṅkṣepika and ābhyavakāśika were not re-explained as dharmāyatana because they were not different from paramāṇu. Next, for parikalpita and vaibhūtvika, both are the same as vijñāna, so it is interpreted that it was not explained as dharmāyatana. Therefore, Sthiramati understands that Vasubandhu did not deny the four kinds of dharmāyatana, but didn’t dare to explain it. There is no negative attitude toward Vasubandhu in Sthiramati’s commentarial attitude in the PSkV, and this clearly shows the character of PSk as a short text (saṃkṣepita).
目次『五蘊論釈』の法処所摂色に関するスティラマティ註について 390
極略色と極䋽色が説かれない理由 390
遍計所起色と自在所生色が説かれない理由 388
結論 388
ISSN00194344 (P)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_390
點閱次數255
建檔日期2022.09.23
更新日期2022.09.23










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
649670

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽