"consciousness"/vijñāna; debates on survival of the spirit; transmigration; "sinification" of Buddhist ideas; Chinese Buddhist translations; amalavijñāna
摘要
In fifth-and sixth-century China, one set of debates between Buddhists and their opponents famously focused on the Buddhist claim that “the spirit survives [death]” 神不滅. Prior scholarship has tended to focus on the development of relevant concepts only beginning in the early fifth century. However, building on work by Kawano, Itō, Nattier, Zacchetti, and Park, this paper argues that important predecessors to the concepts deployed by Buddhist participants in those debates can already be found in the translation literature of the third and fourth centuries. The present paper is part of a larger study of antecedents to the doctrine of *amala-vijñāna (“taintless consciousness”) in the works of Paramārtha 真諦 (499–569), and therefore focuses in particular on terms relating to “consciousness” to label the transmigrating entity. In concert with prior and parallel studies, this study forms part of a larger argument that *amalavijñāna had important background in both India and China.
目次
Introduction 105 “Consciousness”(Shi識)in Fourth-Century Chinese Buddhist “Schools” 106 Early Use of the Terms Shishen/ Shenshi, and Early Anticipations of the Idea that the Spirit Does Not Perish at Death 111 Conclusion 121 Acknowledgements 122 Abbreviations 123 Bibliography 123 Notes on Contributor 126
