從明末時期"祖師禪” 與“狂禪”之辨看中國禪法的晩景=Discussion Philosophical Transformation on the Relationship between “Kuang Chan(狂禪)”and “Zushi Chan(祖師禪)”in Late Ming Dynasty
晩明禪學=Chan Buddhism in Late Ming; 陽明禪=yangming-zen; 祖師禪=“Zushi Chan”; 狂禪=wild Zen=Kuang Chan
摘要
Following with the of trend of Mind School which advocated by Wang yangming(王陽明) Since mid-Ming Dynasty, the relationship became more close together between Confucianism and Buddhism, which arose the trends of flourishing both Confucianism and Buddhism during late Ming Dynasty. However, this trend caused a lot of critics in Confucianist, particularly by Jishan school(葺山學派) which began with Liu zongzhou (劉宗周) & Huangzongxi (黃宗羲) in Zhejiang Province；and Dong-lin School (東林學派) which began with Gu xiancheng (顧憲成) and Gao panlong (高攀龍) etc. in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. It is the main content of this paper that discussed the relationship between Confucianism & Buddhism and its influence of Confucianist thought, and discussion philosophical transformation on the relationship between "Kuang Chan(狂禪) "and "Zushi Chan(祖 師禪)" during late Ming Dynasty. 本文通过对以阳明学派为代表的儒家学者出儒入佛、援佛解儒的学风特 色，指出阳明后学的思想分化，正是儒佛混滥的思想产物。与此，佛教禅 宗僧人则在批辟“狂禅”中，区别“如来禅”与“祖师禅”之间的界限，既重佛 行修证，兼举六度万行，回应了晚明时期如来禅与祖师禅的合流趋势，强 调以法为师、以教证行、以史为鉴，注重的佛法本源性与完整性，有助于 晚明佛教的现实经世取向
目次
I. 引 论 91 II. 阳明学”涉禅之辨 92 III. 明“狂禅”诸说 95 IV. “狂禅”与“祖师禅”之辨 99 V. 结语:“祖师禅”与“如来禅”的合流 106
