網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
『카타 우파니샤드』의 행복치유론에 대하여 - 베단타적 해석을 중심으로=Theory of Happiness and Healing in Kaṭha Upaniṣad: Focused on Vedāntic Interpretation
作者 金浩星 (著)=Kim, Ho-Sǒng (au.)
出處題名 인도철학=印度哲學=Korean Journal of Indian Philosophy
卷期n.50
出版日期2017
頁次191 - 229
出版者印度哲學會
出版者網址 http://krindology.com/
出版地Korea [韓國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言韓文=Korean
附註項저자정보: 동국대학교 불교대학 교수
關鍵詞행복= happiness; 치유= healing; 아트만= ātman; 아난다=ānanda; 수카; 다르마; Vedānta; Nachiketas; Kaṭha Upaniṣad
摘要이 글은 무엇이 행복인지, 또 어떻게 하면 행복할 수 있는지에 대한 하나의 대답을 텍스트로 삼아서 재해석해 보고자 한 것이다. 대상으로 삼았던 ‘하나의 대답’은 힌두교의 문헌인 『카타 우파니샤드』였다. 다만 ‘행복치유’를 ‘행복과 치유’의 의미로 이해해서, 행복론 이외에 치유론도 살펴보고자 하였다. 소년 나치케타스에게 주어진 죽음의 신 야마의 세 가지 선물을 세 가지 차원의 행복이라고 보고서, 행복론을 분석하였다. 그리고 그 배경서사 속에서 치유되어야 할 존재로서의 아버지와 소년의 존재를 헤아렸다. 힌두교, 특히 베단타철학의 입장에서 『카타 우파니샤드』의 행복치유론을 살펴본 뒤, 그것에 대하여 의문을 제기하였다. 과연 인도-힌두교적 컨텍스트에서 나온 행복치유론을 지금의 한국사회에서 어느 정도 수용가능할 것인지를 묻기 위해서였다. 여기서 특히 문제가 된 것은, 형이상학적 차원에만 치우쳐서 물리적 차원의 일을 소홀히 하는 출가주의적 태도였다. 그리고 그것은 똑같이 힌두교의 텍스트이지만, 『마누법전』에 나타나 있는 것과 같은 재가주의적 태도와도 모순되는 것으로 비평하였다.

What is happiness and how can I be happy? What kind of answers are expected when we raise this question to Hinduism? I sought to answer this question referring to KU, which is one of the middle Upaniṣad. Try to think about self(ātman,), that is ultimate happiness. In TU this is attained through the fifth self, the delight(ānanda). In KU this is suggested by the third wish/happiness. Thus Vedanta philosophy’s basic position is that finding self itself is achieving mokṣa. In Hinduism, achieving mokṣa is viewed as a ultimate goal a person should pursue. This is not the interest that people naturally have. People pursue fulfilling love, materials/money and struggle with obligation/burden that a man has. And when these external conditions are fulfilled it is called happiness. The issue is two different dimensions of happiness – in KU this is suggested as three types, but you can see a sharp contrast when excluding the second wish/happiness. Achieving mokṣa that is finding self is metaphysical and rising above the mundane world. However, things like love, material, money, and obligations are physical and mundane. In what relationship are these two different dimensions of values? First look at KU’s position. When Nachiketas proposed three wishes, those three wishes were presented as all necessary. Therefore, physical and metaphysical dimensions are horizontal and symbiotic relationship. However, in Yama’s perspective, it looks like he implied that the third happiness is superior, and the first and second can be replaced by the third happiness. The issue of two dimensions is not restricted to the theory of happiness. It is also same for the theory of healing. If you can earn happiness from achieving mokṣa, can itself earn healing? or can you earn happiness from healing? It is undoubtful that achieving nirvana means healing. If you look at the writings about finding self, if was suggested that finding self is abandoning both extremes of happiness and sadness, or overcoming sadness. However, at the same time, there is a room to interpret it as happiness via healing that is healing via psychological and yogic training. Nakamura Hajime has not overlooked at this point.
目次I 머리말. 192
II 서사 구조와 세 가지 소원. 196
III 행복치유론의 함의(含意). 205
IV 행복론에 대한 비평. 217
V 맺음말. 223
ISSN12263230 (P)
點閱次數63
建檔日期2023.10.22
更新日期2023.11.11










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
684800

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽