 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Note on the Vihāra as a Recipient of Donations in Earlier Theravāda Buddhism |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Kieffer-Pülz, Petra (著)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
創価大学国際仏教学高等研究所年報=Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University=ソウカ ダイガク コクサイ ブッキョウガク コウトウ ケンキュウジョ ネンポウ
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.27 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2024 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 29 - 40 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 創価大学・国際仏教学高等研究所 |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://iriab.soka.ac.jp/publication/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 八王子, 日本 [Hachioji, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | beneficiary; cetiya; donation; donor; monk; navakamma; nun; vihāra; recipient; saṅgha; Theravāda Buddhism |
|---|
| 摘要 | In the canon of the Theravādins the recipients of donations are either the Saṅgha or individuals – monastics as well as non-monastics. In the layer of the Aṭṭhakathā commentaries in addition a vihāra (“monastery”), a cetiya (“shrine”), and navakamma (“restoration work”) are mentioned. Their introduction mainly serves the purpose of enabling monastics to
navigate certain rules relating to the economic activity of the Saṅgha, primarily to accept objects not allowed (akappiya) to the monastics. Among these three recipients the vihāra became the most prominent showing that fully developed monasteries with monastic communities residing in them for quite long periods had by then become so prominent that
they could function as legal substitute for the Buddhist Saṅgha. |
|---|
| 目次 | Aṭṭhakathā layer 34
Conclusions 38
Acknowledgement: 38
Abbreviations: 38
References: 39 |
|---|
| ISSN | 13438980 (P) |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 77 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2024.05.24 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.07.12 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
