Ontological Indeterminacy and Its Soteriological Relevance: An Assessment of Mou Zongsan's (1909-1995) Interpretation of Zhiyi's (538-597) Tiantai Buddhism
網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


閱讀本文


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
Ontological Indeterminacy and Its Soteriological Relevance: An Assessment of Mou Zongsan's (1909-1995) Interpretation of Zhiyi's (538-597) Tiantai Buddhism
作者 Kantor, Hans-Rudolf
出處題名 Philosophy East and West
卷期v.56 n.1
出版日期2006.01
頁次16 - 68
出版者University of Hawaii Press
出版者網址 https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
出版地Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言英文=English
附註項Author affiliation: Graduate Institute of East Asian Humanities, Huafan University, Taibei
關鍵詞sects; Mahayana; religions; Tiantai; 中國佛教=Chinese Buddhism; 比丘=Buddhist Monk=Bhiksu=Bhikkhu; 本體論=Ontology; 佛教人物=Buddhist; 儒佛會通=佛教與儒家=Buddhism and Confucianism
摘要This is an attempt to clarify a vital ontological aspect of Tiantai teaching created by the sixth-century Chinese Buddhist monk Zhiyi. To do this Tiantai must first be distanced from Mou Zongsan's interpretation of its central pattern of nonduality, a reconstructive theory that refers to both Chinese Buddhism and Confucianism and sees a "two-level ontology" in Chinese philosophical traditions, grounded in both the Chinese Buddhist patterns of "nonduality between the sacred and the profane" and the Kantian distinction between "noumena and phenomena." Part 1 of this article is a critical analysis and evaluation of Mou's theory, concluding that the Buddhist patterns of nonduality and the Kantian distinction are not mutually convertible. Part 2 focuses on Tiantai ontology in the specific context of its soteriological relevance, demonstrating that the ideal of "universally saving all sentient beings" in Tiantai soteriology must presuppose the conception of "nonduality of/between the sacred and the profane," and that the ambiguous ontological status of existing things corresponds to this soteriological doctrine in a manner that can only be expressed by a "paradoxical articulation." The ontological meaning of Tiantai teaching is then specified with regard to Zhiyi's discussion of reality and the diversity of existing things. The three constitutive elements of Tiantai Buddhism—the soteriological doctrine of nonduality, ontological indeterminacy, and paradoxical articulation—are all based on an ideal of universal salvation that excludes a level of "being" transcending the realm of sentient beings. This conclusion directly controverts Mou's metaphysical notion of a "two-level ontology.
ISSN00318221 (P); 15291898 (E)
DOI10.1353/pew.2006.0012
點閱次數1966
建檔日期2006.09.12
更新日期2020.08.27










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

臺灣大學圖書館臺灣大學數位人文研究中心
National Taiwan University Library © 1995 - 2025. All rights reserved

doi:10.6681/NTURCDH.DB_DLMBS/Collection

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
134997
題名
Ontological Indeterminacy and Its Soteriological Relevance: An Assessment of Mou Zongsan's (1909-1995) Interpretation of Zhiyi's (538-597) Tiantai Buddhism
作者
Kantor, Hans-Rudolf
說明
請將校正的建議,填寫於下方,若有參考網址請一併提供,感謝您!
*
聯絡資訊:
姓名
*
信箱
*
電話

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽