網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
《水懺》與<水懺序>之關係三論
作者 白金銑 (著)=Pai, Chin-hsien (au.)
出處題名 正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
卷期n.45
出版日期2008.06.25
頁次187 - 235
出版者正觀雜誌社
出版者網址 http://www.tt034.org.tw/
出版地南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
附註項作者為國立臺灣師範大學國文所博士班候選人
關鍵詞水懺=Buddhist Water-confession ritual; 水懺序=The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual; 以水洗瘡=washing an ulcer with water; 洗心懺悔; 袁盎=Yuan Young; 晁錯=Tsao Tsou; 三昧法水=Samadhi Buddha-truth water
摘要本文透過敦煌文獻、佛教文獻與人物史傳,處理學界佛教界對《水懺》與<水懺序>間一直混淆不清的三個問題。其一,《水懺》的主體內容,早在六世紀時已含備在敦煌本二十卷《佛名經》中,並不是<水懺序>中所說的唐代悟達國師(知玄,811~933A.D.)所撰。其二,《水懺》的主體內容(三障懺悔文字)是印度大乗佛教「以水洗瘡」的緣起療心之懺悔譬喻,其根本方法是眾生須以緣起的「慈悲心力」、「悲喜心水」進行懺悔,不是依賴<水懺序>中迦諾迦尊者的「三昧法水」。其三,《水懺》與<水懺序>其實是兩篇截然不同、各自獨立的懺悔文字,不可勉強合一。亦即,六世紀時的《水懺》,不等於十五世紀神異化後的《三昧水懺》,若勉強將二法合一,即將嚴重誤解古德撰寫《水懺》之初衷。

In this paper, the three questions consistently confused between "Buddhist Water-confession Ritual"in the academic and Buddhist sectors have been handled through Tun Huang literature, Buddhist literature and historical/biograghic data. The first one is that, the main content of "Buddhist Water-confession Ritual" had been included in Vol. 20, Tun Huang version(Buddha Name Sutra) in the 6th century rather than as said by "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual" that is was written by BUddhist leader Wu Ta(CHin Hsuan, 811~833A.D.) during Tang dynasty. The second one is that, the main content of "Buddhist Water-confession ritual"(three-obstacle confession text) was a confession metephor of origin mind therapy-"washing an ulcer with water" in the Mahayana of India, which suggested the fundamental method for the sentient beings to confess should use the origin-related "mind power of mercy", "compassion-joy water of mind" instead of relying on "Samadhi Buddha-truth water of the reverend Cha No Ka in "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual". The third one is that, in fact "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" and "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual" are totally different texts of confession independently from each other, not allowed to be combined in one reluctantly. That is to say, "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" in the 6th century is not equal to "Samadhi Water-confession Ritual" after the 15th century. The motif of the ancint master who wrote "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" will be seriously misunderstood if if the two rituals were combined reluctantly.
目次一、導言 187
二、「水懺」與「水懺序」的關係三論 196
三、結語 225
參考書目 227
ISSN16099575 (P)
點閱次數2512
建檔日期2008.07.11
更新日期2017.09.05










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
162372

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽