網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
弥勒論書の三性説 ─ 識の相分等との関連において ─=On the Tri-svabhava Doctrine in Maitreya's Works
作者 竹村牧男 (著)=Takemura, Makio (au.)
出處題名 哲学・思想論集=Studies in Philosophy=テツガク・シソウ ロンシュウ
卷期n.15
出版日期1990.03
頁次155 - 188
出版者筑波大学哲学・思想学系
出版者網址 http://www.logos.tsukuba.ac.jp/Nlogoskhp.html
出版地桜村, 茨城県, 日本
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言日文=Japanese
摘要 It is said that there were two types of theories in the Yogacara-school, that is, Nirakaravada and Sakalravada. According to Bodhibhadra's Jnanasarasamuccayanibandhana, the difference between the two theories was in their understancling of akara (objective images) in the vijnana (cognition). Asanga asserted the former theory and understood the akara as parikalpita-svabhava (nothing other than not true existence). Dignaga and his followers, on the otherhand, held the latter view and took it as paratantra-svabhava (a somewhat real phenomenon). This interpretation of the two theories is widely accepted among presentday-buddhist scholars. In his "Die Philosophie des Buddhismus," Frauwallner states a similar opinion that Maitreya and Vasbandhu are Nirakaravadin, while Asanga is Sakaravadin.
Then a question arises whether or not the old philosophers of the Yogacara school such as Maitreya really said that akara in vijnana is parikalpita-svabhava? In this paper, I try to clear up this problem by investigating the Tri-svabhava doctrine especially in Maitreya's Mahayanasutralarpkara and Madhyantavibhaga.
My conclusion is that the assertion that tha akara is parikalpita-svabhava is not found in these Maitreya's works at the start of the Yogacara-school.
目次問題の所在 155
一、『大乗荘厳経論』の三性説 160
二、『弁中辺論 』の三性説 169
結び 181
ISSN02867648 (P)
點閱次數313
建檔日期2010.03.16
更新日期2020.06.24










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
225331

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽