|
|
|
|
作者 |
曹志成 (撰)
|
出處題名 |
國際佛學研究=The Annual of International Buddhistic Studies
|
卷期 | n.2 |
出版日期 | 1992.12 |
頁次 | 307 - 325 |
出版者 | 靈鷲山般若文教基金會國際佛學研究中心 |
出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
關鍵詞 | 十地經; 世親; 心識觀; 緣起觀; 三界唯心 |
摘要 | 本文是從文獻學,義理分析的雙重角度,並透過當代日本學者坂本幸男,玉城康四郎與伊藤瑞叡等位的研究成果,重新探討《十地經》與世親《十地經論》中的心識觀與緣起觀的內容及兩者之關係,並進一步澄清了「唯心」一詞所隱含的歧義性及可能的課題.
從本文的探討,我們可以知道《十地經》與《十地經論》的「識」是虛妄的,而「三界唯心」的「心」則是真變和合的. 且我們亦可得知「十二有支依於一心」的「一心」則是偏重十二緣起順觀義的和合觀,換言之,它是「三界唯心」底絕對知識所投射出的相對知識.
另一方面由本文的考察,我們也發現「唯心」的意涵也不只是「心理存在論」上的真心或本心,它也可指涉非固定實體性的「情境主體」及「觀法的能動主體本身」. 所謂的「唯心」的「唯」也不一定非具「遮外境,肯定內識」的「觀念論」色彩不可; 它也可能意味著「遮離心之作者」「不遮外境」的「心境」「平等性」:亦即指涉著「在世俗上,心境俱有; 在勝義上,心境俱無」的意涵.
A philological and semantic investigation into the term "`cittamatra` "helps find and clarify the ambiguities of the term and its possible issues. By this investigation we learn that the "shih" as in shih-di-jing and Shih-di-jing-lun is void and un-real,but the mind as in the Only Mind of the Three Worlds is of the orchestration of the Real and the un-Real,the two in perfect harmony. In addition,we also learn that the "one mind" as in the only Mind of the three worlds is of the orchestrational view of the shih-erh yuan-ch'i as in the sense of shun kuan; that is, it is of a relative knowledge which is projected from the Absolute Knowledge of the Mind of the Three worlds. It is also concluded that the issue of the "Only Mind " covers not only the (un-) Real Mind as in psychology but the issue of the "situational subject" and the "by-Law motionable subject-in-itself." |
點閱次數 | 852 |
建檔日期 | 1998.07.22
|
更新日期 | 2023.11.14 |
|
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。
|