 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
論禪宗公案中的矛盾與不可說=The Contradiction and Inexpressibility in Ch'an Kung-an(Koan) |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
楊惠南 (著)=楊惠男 (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
國立臺灣大學哲學論評=National Taiwan University Philosophical Review
|
|---|
| 卷期 | n.9 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 1986.01 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 139 - 153 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 國立臺灣大學哲學系=NTU Philosophy Department |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://review.philo.ntu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | 公案; 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 金剛般若經; 楞伽經; 佛性; 空 |
|---|
| 摘要 | There are three types of Ch'an kung-an that often bewilder Buddhologists; namely，(1) the
contradictory，(2) the inexpressible，and (3) mixture of the two. D. T. Suzuki and the scholars
influenced by him，for example，E.Fromm，think that these three types of kung-an imply the truth
realized by Ch'an masters, the truth which goes beyond daily language and logic.
However，as the author points out，there are two traditions in Ch'an School：(1) the "Buddha-
nature" tradition based on the Lankavatara Sutra, and (2) the prajna tradition based on the Diamond
Sutra. Suzuki and Fromm's interpretation only emphasizes the first tradition and ignores the
second one. According to the second tradition，the contradiction and inexpressibility of kung-an may
seem to indicate the truth of non-existence--sunyata, not necessarily indicating the truly
existing "Buddha-nature".
|
|---|
| 目次 | 一. 三種類型的公案：矛盾的，不可說的，與混用的
二. 禪宗的兩種思想傳統
三. 結論 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10158995 (P) |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 1329 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2000.10.11
|
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.08.18 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
