 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
中古時期椅子與佛教的關係=Buddhism and the History of the Chair in Medieval China |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
柯嘉豪 (著)=Kieschnick, John Henry (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
一九九八年第五十屆亞洲研究協會年會=1998 Fiftieth Annual Meeting of Association for Asian Studies
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.69 n.4 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 1998.03.29 |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 附註項 | 735; 會議地點：美國華盛頓特區; 主協辦單位：美國亞洲研究學會
Association for Asian Studies (AAS), U.S.A. |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | 中國歷史=Chinese History; 中國文化=Chinese Culture; 佛教=Buddhism; 椅子=Chair |
|---|
| 摘要 | Up to the Tang，Chinese for the most part sat on the ground，
on mats. Through the Han，while various sorts of low couches and platforms
came into use，chairs were unheard of. In the Tang all of this began to
change. We have a few scattered references to chairs in the Tang，as well
as a representation of a figure seated in a chair in an early Tang tomb
mural. More evidence appears in the late Tang and Five Dynasties period.
By the Southern Song，use of the chair had spread throughout Chinese
society，and has continued to maintain its position as a basic element
in Chinese interiors ever since. Already in the Song，thoughtful writers
contemplated the origins of the Chinese chair，and modern scholars have
proposed a number of theories for the chair's origins as well.
In my paper，I begin by tracing the rise of the chair in China, and
recounting the various proposals for its origin. Next，based on evidence
in the Buddhist canon，murals, steles, poetry and travelogues, I argue
that the chair was first brought to China by monks as a form of monastic
furniture，and eventually spread from monasteries to the rest of Chinese
society. In my conclusion，I reflect on the significance of these findings
for our understanding of the impact of Buddhism on Chinese culture. |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 294 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2001.02.21
|
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.06.06 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
