網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
淨土詮釋傳統中的宗門意識 -- 論宋天台義學者對元照《觀無量壽經義疏》之批判及其所造成之反響=Sectarianism in the Pure Land Hermeneutic Tradition:On T'ien-t'ai Exegetes' Ctrique of Yuan-chao's Commentary on the Contemplation Sutra and the Repercussions of t
作者 黃啟江 (著)=Huang, Chi-chiang (au.)
出處題名 中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
卷期n.14
出版日期2001.09
頁次309 - 352
出版者中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies
出版者網址 http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
出版地新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese; 英文=English
附註項全文:http://www.chibs.edu.tw/chibs/journal/JR-BJ001/14/309-350. htm
關鍵詞黃啟江; Huang, Chi-chiang; 《觀經》; 《新疏》; 《扶新論》; 《輔正解》; 道因; 戒度; 元照; 宗門意識; Contemplation Sutra; Hsin-shu; Kuan-ching Fu-hsin Lun; Fu-cheng-chieh; Tao-yin; Chieh-tu; Yuan-chao; Sectarianism
摘要本文所討論的主題 -- 宋代天台義學者在詮釋《觀無量壽經》時所表現的「宗門意識」 (sectarianism) -- 代表淨土詮釋傳統裏一個很值得注意的現象. 這現象之出現,可追溯到靈芝元照對《觀無量壽經》所做之新詮釋. 由於元照之觀經疏有擇取諸家舊疏之長,而被視為有尊善導疏而抑智顗疏之傾向,遂受到宋天台義學僧草菴道因之批判. 本文詳析道因對元照義疏所做的各項指控,及天台學者自吳克己至志磐等一脈相承的宗門意識.
由於道因對元照義疏之批判以《輔正解》一書之面貌出現,而其原書今已不存,只見於拙菴戒度《觀經扶新論》之引文中,本文亦根據戒度所錄之文,評估其書內容,說明它對元照義疏批判之強烈宗門意識.
拙菴戒度為聲援元照義疏而著《觀經扶新論》,反駁《輔正解》對元照義疏之指控,切中道因議論之弊. 他指出道因「建立門庭」而作《輔正解》,故意扭曲元照新疏之看法,強行批判,故其說理不勝辭,破綻隨處可見. 道因強烈之宗門意識所驅使,致使其在《輔正解》之議論充滿偏見,而吳克己,宗鑑,志磐等人卻附和其說,可見道因宗門意識對天台山家派義學影響之深.

The topic of this paper -- sectarianism as expressed in Sung T'ien-t'ai scholars' exegeses of the Contemplation Sutra -- represents a noteworthy phenomenon in the Pure Land hermeneutic tradition. The phenomenon owes its occurrence to Ling-chih Yuan-chao's exegesis of the Contemplation Sutra. As Yuan-chao's commentary electively synthesizes the fine points of previous exegeses, it was perceived by Ch'ao-an Tao-yin,a Sung T'ien-t'ai exegete,as honoring Shan-tao's commentary at the expense of that of Chih-i. This paper details Tao-yin's accusation of some hermeneutic points found in Yuan-chao's commentary and relates the persistent sectarianism that characterizes the works compiled by T'ien-t'ai historians from Wu K'e-chi to Chih-p'an.
Tao-yin's critique of Yuan-chao's commentary appears as a text called Fu-cheng-chieh, which is no longer extant but survives, in fragments, as interspersed quotes in the Kuan-ching fu-hsin lun by Chuo-an Chieh-tu. Based on this remainder of the Fu-cheng-chieh, this paper also assesses the text,discusses its contents, and reveals the sectarianism that underpins its criticism of Yuan-chao's hermeneutics.
Chuo-an Chieh-tu wrote the Kuan-ching fu-hsin lun to uphold Yuan-chao's commentary. In his work,he refutes Tao-yin's accusation of Yuan-chao's commentary,pointedly listing the flaws of the Fu-cheng-chieh and showing Tao-yin's sectarian sentiment. In his view,Tao-yin,purporting to "build up [T'ien-t'ai's] gate and yard," wrote the Fu-cheng-chieh in which he deliberately distorted Yuan-chao's viewpoints and engaged in an acrimonious attack on Yuan-chao's commentary. As a result,it is full of errors and flaws. Driven by unyielding sectarianism,Tao-yin infuses in his discourse with much bias, which was to inspire such T'ien-t'ai scholars as Wu K'e-chi,Tsung-chien,and Chih-p'an. It shows clearly that his sectarianism had a large impact on T'ien-t'ai's Pure Land exegesis.
目次一. 序言
二. 元照《觀經新疏》之製作與反響
三. 草菴道因與《輔正解》
四.《輔正解》之「疑目」與元照《新疏》之原文
五.《輔正解》之「難詞」對元照《新疏》之批判
六.《扶新論》vs.《輔正解》
七. 結語
ISSN10177132 (P)
點閱次數2070
建檔日期2001.10.19
更新日期2017.06.20










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
350609

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽