對「空」之闡述的探索 -- 論《不真空》之評破即色宗=Explore the Method to Establish 'Sunyata' -- On the Criticism upon the School of Jise (Matter-as-Such) in the Treatise on the Unreal-Void
不真空論=The Treatise on the Unreal-Void; 即色宗=The Schhol of Jise (Matter-as-such); 支道林=Zhi Daolin; 色空關係=the Relationship between Rupa and Sunyata (Matter and Void)
In The Treatise on the Unreal-Void by Seng-Chao, there's a criticism on the School of Jise (Matter-as-Such), which bears a long-term argument. By observing the ancient commentary books available, with modern researches relevant, here we try to response to three crucial questions: the one 'Jise' indicates, the reason why Seng-Chao criticized on him, and Seng-Chao's standpoint from which he debates. The criticism doesn't identify well with Zhi Daolin, though Seng-Chao's words make sense to a great extent, which is worth our understanding. Meanwhile, by the sight of an observer, their difference results from that they don't share the same way to prove the core-conception Sunyata, which may contribute to the different background of the spread of Indian Buddhist texts at that early time.
