網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學佛學博物館相關連結
 
Bookmark and Share


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
論人文社會科學的科際整合探索理念暨理路=On the Heuristic Principle and Future Direction of Interdisciplinary Integrations of Humanities and Social Sciences
作者 傅偉勳
出處題名 佛光學刊=Fokuang Journal
卷期n.1
出版日期1996.06
頁次117 - 129
出版者南華管理學院
出版者網址 http://cm2.nhu.edu.tw/main.php
出版地嘉義縣, 臺灣 [Chia-i hsien, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
關鍵詞人文學科=Humanities; 社會科學=Social sciences; 自然科學=Natural sciences; 科際整合=Interdisciplinary integrations; 哲學=Philosophy; 生死學=Life-and-death studies
摘要拙論提出不可分割的兩大問題,進行深層考察。其一,「人文學科」與「社會科 學」的分合所在究竟是甚麼?其二,跳過兩者分合問題的反思考察,我們應如何適予連貫融 合兩者的分別探索方式以及探索成果?我們如何於此世紀之交,建立足以貫通兩者的新時代 「科際整合」探索理念暨理路?尤其針對我國學術的未來發展來說,我們應如何建立具有本 土化意味的科際整合探索理念暨理路?為了解答這兩大問題,我們必須結合歷史的發展線索 之充分理解與嚴謹的學理性探層反思。 我們檢視西方學統的歷史發展,可以發現到,到了近現代一方面有了人文學科與社會科學( 以及自然科學)的細密分化,另一方面(尤其近二十年來)又有跨越各科的科際整合大趨勢 ,在「傳統哲學終吉」時代,哲學的一大功能顯為「科際整合之學」。配合此一科際整合學 術運動,我們以「心性體認本位」的生死學建立嘗試說明,開拓我們本土化意味的人文社會 科學發展理路的可能性。

This paper begins with the presentation of two inseparable problems, then attempts an in-depth philosophical investigation into the true nature of the problems. The first problem concerns both the distinctions between and meeting ground for the humanities and the social sciences. The second problem concerns proper ways of integrating the respective forms of academic research involved with humanistic studies and the social sciences, with a view to establishing a workable heuristic principle and determining a new direction for interdisciplinary integrations in the next century. To solve these interrelated problems, we must rely on a comprehen sive understanding of the fundamental ideas underlying the Western academic tradition. Furthermore, we must engage in critical philosophical reflections concerning these ideas. In investigating the historical development of the Western academic tradition, two contradictory trends can be found. On the one hand, the gap between humanistic studies and the social sciences has widened in modern times. On the other hand, recent years have witnessed a marked tendency toward interdisciplinary integration of all human learning. In the new era of the post-Heideggerian "ending of philosophy," one of the most important functions of post-traditional philosophy seems to consist in a methodological search for the heuristic principle and future direction of interdisciplinary integrations. Building on this new, and promising, academic trend, "life-and-death studies" grounded in "hsin/hsing" (mind/nature) realization can be used to illustrate the academic feasibility of developing our own (Taiwanese/Chinese) modes of humanistic and scientific studies in the forth coming century.
點閱次數32
建檔日期2017.01.18
更新日期2018.01.12










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
570255

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽