網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
杜順初祖說的考察=Investigating the Question of Master Dushun's Status as the First Huayan Patriarch
作者 平燕紅 (著)=Ping, Yan-Hong (au.)
出處題名 法鼓佛學學報=Dharma Drum Journal of Buddhist Studies
卷期n.26
出版日期2020.06.01
頁次55 - 81
出版者法鼓文理學院
出版者網址 https://www.dila.edu.tw/
出版地新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
附註項作者單位:國際佛教學大學院大學博士班研究生
關鍵詞華嚴宗=Huayan School; 杜順=Dunshun; 智正=Zhizheng; 初祖=the first patriarch; 正統性=orthodoxy
摘要唐代華嚴宗五祖說現今已為學術界廣泛認可,但這一祖統說的建立、發展還存在相當大的問題,其中日本學界對杜順「華嚴初祖」這一身份也是多有齟齬,最著名的當為境野黃洋博士提出的「智正初祖說」與常盤大定博士對此提出的「杜順初祖說」之爭。在探討唐初華嚴宗發展之時,要考慮到華嚴宗初祖這一帶有宗派性質說法的正式提出與華嚴學者之間的學說上的教理承襲之間的區別。當一個宗派成立之時,其正統性的意識也隨之自覺產生,而祖統傳承的確立其實是伴隨著這一正統性意識的覺醒而隨後被創造的,所以對於杜順其人,我們要從以下兩點來考察,一是關注杜順對智儼及法藏等後代華嚴學家的學術影響,以及這一影響何時為人所認同;二是關於杜順的初祖地位是從何時為人所認可,這兩點很容易被混為一談,但實際上這是兩條不同的主線,不能混為一談。

The notion of the five Tang dynasty Huayan patriarchs is broadly accepted by historians. However, there subsists important questions regarding the establishment and development of this patriarchal lineage. The identity of Master Dushun as the first patriarch of this lineage has been a subject of debate in the Japanese scholarly community. Professor Koyo Sakaino has suggested that the first patriarch was actually Master Zhizheng, whereas Professor Daijo Tokiwa has maintained the view that it was Master Dunshun. When discussing the development of the Huayan School during the early Tang dynasty, specifically regarding the status of Master Dushun, it is essential to consider both the sectarian accounts from that period and the doctrinal disagreements between Huayan masters. When a Buddhist sect is established, an orthodoxy naturally forms in its wake. The heritage of the tradition as well as the patriarchal lineage is constructed subsequently on the basis of this orthodoxy. Consequently, the figure of Master Dunshun should be examined along two lines of inquiry. One the one hand, it is necessary to investigate his doctrinal influence on later Huayan masters, such as Master Zhiyan and Master Fazang. Secondly, one must determine the period at which his influence and status as the first patriarch was established. While these two issues can be easily mixed up, they are actually two distinct topics, each requiring their own investigation.
目次一、前言 58
二、智正及其《華嚴經疏》59
三、兩博士之爭 64
四、關於初祖身份的一些問題 66
五、正統性的自覺產生 74
六、結語 77
ISSN19968000 (P)
DOI10.6889/DDJBS.202006_(26).0002
點閱次數250
建檔日期2021.01.20
更新日期2021.01.20










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
603973

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽