網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
Representing Buddhism through Mise-en-scène, Diegesis, and Mimesis: Kim Ki-duk’s Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring
作者 Green, Ronald S. ; Mun, Chan-ju
出處題名 International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture=국제불교문화사상사학회
卷期v.29 n.1
出版日期2019.06
頁次177 - 203
出版者International Association for Buddhist Thought and Culture
出版者網址 http://iabtc.org/
出版地Seoul, Korea [首爾, 韓國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言英文=English
附註項Author Affiliations: Ronald S. GREEN(University of Wisconsin-Madison), Chanju MUN(Dongguk University)
關鍵詞Buddhist Movies; Cinematic Symbolism; Seasonal Allegory; Religious Narratives; Visual Design
摘要This paper examines elements identified as “Buddhist” in the Korean film Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring (K. Pom yŏrŭm kaŭl kyŏul kŭrigo pom) written and directed by Kim Ki-duk (b. 1960) and released in 2003. It draws on research on this topic by numerous notable researchers of Korean film. For the sake of our investigation, we have arranged various points made by these scholars into three sections reflecting categories philosophers have long used to analyze drama. These are (1) mise-en-scene: the visual design of the film, (2) diegesis: the fictive narrative space of the film, and (3) mimesis: symbolic or ritual action in the film. This arrangement is based on a study of Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring by Pak Chongch’ŏn. This paper reorganizes Pak’s analysis and expands it to include the ideas of other Korean critics along with our own. Specifically, the paper looks at how the director uses mimicry, seasonal allegory, and various elements of visual design to create a multifaceted religious narrative. We analyze his assorted usages of Buddhist iconographical images and temple sounds including chanting of the Heart Sūtra, but argue that Kim additionally builds the storyline with cinematic symbolism and metaphor taken from Yin/Yang philosophy, Five Elements theory, Christianity, Jainism, and Korean folklore. We also offer a theory of Buddhist adoptive society in terms of the island and orphan metaphor found in the film. The paper considers whether Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter… and Spring falls short of the requirements necessary for designating it as a “Buddhist film” as argued by a number of researchers, particularly if it lacks a soteriological solution to the inherent problem of human suffering at the forefront of the movie.
目次Abstract
Mise-en-scène: The Visual Design of the Film 179
Diegesis: The Narrative World of the Film 186
Mimesis: Symbolic or Ritual Action in the Film 191
Conclusions 197
References 202
ISSN15987914 (P)
DOI10.16893/IJBTC.2019.06.29.1.177
點閱次數230
建檔日期2021.03.11
更新日期2021.03.11










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
607589

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽