網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
vijñāna에 관한 논변=Debate on consciousness between Vasubandhu and Vaiyākaraṇa
作者 이종철 (著)=Lee, Jong-cheol (au.)
出處題名 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
卷期v.1
出版日期2000.05
頁次399 - 427
出版者불교학연구회=佛教學研究會
出版者網址 http://www.kabs.re.kr/
出版地Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言韓文=Korean
關鍵詞Vasubandhu; Vaiyākaraṇa; Abhidharmakośa; Vyākhyāyukti; vijñāna; svatantra; anātman
摘要 In this article, I would like to point out the fact that Vasubandhu not only approached dependent origination from an ontological perspective, but that he also put great importance on its episte- mological dimension having to do with the phenomenology of mind and consciousness, taking care to focus in on how the theory may be applied to the arising of consciousness. This article, keeping in mind the above problematik deals with the unfolding of Vasubandhu's thought in the process of moving from the Abhidharmakośa to the Vyākhyāyukti. This represents an attempt to reconstruct an integral basis for Vasubandhu's discussion of the process of co-arising consciousness and his theory of epistemology, stretching from the time he wrote the Abhidharmakośa all the way down to his later Yogācāra-vijñānavāda inclination period.
Through various debates with Indian schools such as the Sāṃkhya, the Vaiśeṣika, and the Vaiyākaraṇa, we can see that Vasubandhu rejects any belief in the existence of an actual self conceived as the “subject responsible for action” or as the “subject of cognition”. According to the basic tenets of Vasubandhu's theory of consciousness ― based on his view that a permanent real self does not exist (anātman) ― in the case of consciousness there does not exist any subject behind it that engages in acts of cognition. There can only be the workings of consciousness which arise constantly dependent on conditions.
Focusing on the debates between Vasubandhu and Vaiyākaraṇa, which are introduced in the Abhidharmakośa and the Vyākhyāyukti (Peking ed. 104b2-106b8), this article deals with the problems which were the object of their discussion. In the Appendix, I have enclosed a critical edition of extant Tibetan translations of the Vyākhyāyukti as they appear in the Peking, Derge, Narthang and Cone editions.
目次1. 들어가는 말 399
2. 문법학자의 비판에 깃든 형이상학적 입장 401
3. 인식주체를 둘러싼 문제 403
4. 인식의 존재론적 성격 404
5. “인식은 대상을 식별한다”는 문장의 뜻 406
6. 맺음말 413
『釋軌論』티벳어 번역(VY. P.104b2-106b8)校訂本 415
약호와 참고문헌 424
ISSN15980642 (P)
點閱次數82
建檔日期2021.03.16
更新日期2021.03.23










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
608103

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽