網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
上座部大寺派とアバヤギリ派における頭陀支の解釈:『解脱道論』の所属部派に関連して=Interpretations of the Ascetic Practice (dhutaṅga) According to the Mavāvihāravāsins and the Abhayagirivihāravāsins: On the School Affiliation of the Vimuttimagga (解脱道論)
作者 林隆嗣 (著)=Hayahsi, Takatsugu (au.)
出處題名 パーリ学仏教文化学=Journal of Pali and Buddhist Studies=パーリガク ブッキョウ ブンカガク
卷期n.31
出版日期2017
頁次31 - 50
出版者パーリ学仏教文化学会=SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF PALI AND BUDDHIST CULTURE
出版地大阪, 日本 [Osaka, Japan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言日文=Japanese
關鍵詞パーリ註釈文献; ブッダゴーサ; Visuddhimagga; アッタカター; 概念(仮法)
摘要Buddhaghosa introduces unorthodox views of anonymous ones in his Visuddhimagga (Vism) and other Pāli commentaries, while Dhammapāla in his sub-commentaries sometimes identifies them as the Abhayagirivihāravāsins’. It has been pointed that some of the views are found in the Vimuttimagga (Vim), and consequently the Vim has been considered to be the work of this school. Nevertheless, some scholars threw doubts about the relevance of the coincidence of the three facts, that is, the anonymous ones’ views known to Buddhaghosa, the Dhammapāla’s identification and the doctine in the Vim. It seems, however, not fair if we, reputing that a theory is not enough proven, attempt to make an alternative explanation besed on a pile of hypotheses without verification and further investigation, while there is no rebuttal. It has to be more carefully weighed that if a sigle dhamma as a constituent element is different, it affects the basis of the elaborate system of the Theravāda Abhidhamma philosophy. In this sense, a placement of dhutaṅga (ascetic practice) in the Abhidhamma categories can be of great significance as one of the criteria to characterize the Abhayagirivihāravāsins.
Taking that into account, I reexamined the controversy over the definition of dhutaṅga in the Vism and the Vim, and then considered how and why the Mahāvihāravāsins and the Abhayagirivihāravāsins classified it into a different category. Overviewing the references in the Vism and the Vim and especially looking closely the passage in the Vim: “[Dhutaṅga] should not be stated to be wholesome, unwholesome or indeterminate,” one may challenge their concordance. However, there is a further crucial evidence to link the Vim to the Abhayagirivihāravāsins, that in the Vim dhutaṅga is explicitly mentioned in the list of concept (paññatti) which has been unknown to the scholars.
Looking into the Pāli canon, we often meet ascetic practitioners who are of evil wishes, pursue a reputation, and so on. There are philosophical gaps between the Vism and Pāli commentaries, too, regarding the understanding of dhutaṅga. Furthermore, we notice that the definition of dhutaṅga in the Vism was not given by Buddhaghosa, but was quoted from “Aṭṭhakathā” as an old commentary. It seems reasonable to suppose that discussions as to dhutaṅga arose in the Sīhaḷa-sources of Pāli commentaries and bhāṇakas (reciters), and that these two schools built their definitions of dhutaṅga, receiving the preceding discussions and trying to refuse the view that it can be unwholesome.
目次1.『清浄道論』の頭陀支概念説批判と復註による部派の特定 33
2.『解脱道論』における「不應説善不善無記」と頭陀支概念説 35
3.頭陀概念説の根拠と不善の頭陀支 38
4.大寺派は不善の頭陀修行者をどう解釈するか 41
5.大寺派の古註釈と経典暗誦者(バーナカ) 42
6.まとめ 44
ISSN09148604 (P); 24242233 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20769/jpbs.31.0_31
點閱次數316
建檔日期2021.12.22
更新日期2022.05.05










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
631292

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽