 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
円月の行信論研究=A Study of Engetsu’s Theory of Practice and Faith |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
伊藤雅玄 (著)=いとうまさはる (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.65 n.2 (總號=n.141) |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2017.03.20 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 658 - 661 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| 附註項 | 龍谷大学大学院 |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | 行信論; 円月; 善海; 月珠; 善譲; 豊前学派; 空華学派 |
|---|
| 摘要 | This paper examines how Engetsu’s 円月 doctrinal disputes with Zenkai 善海 influenced the development of Engetsu’s theory of practice and faith. In this dispute, Zenkai criticized Gesshu’s 月珠 theory of practice and faith. Gesshu was Engetsu’s master and Engetsu responded to the criticism in place of Gesshu. Zenkai’s criticism contained three major points, the most important being that the virtue of myōgō 名号 lies only in the invocation of Amitābha’s Name, shōmyō 称名. Engetsu responded by emphasizing that the virtues of myōgō are not only contained in the invocation of Amitābha’s Name but embraced in gonen 五念 (five gates of mindfulness). Engetsu emphasized a point that differed from Gesshu on the idea of practice and faith. This difference may be regarded as the development of ideas of practice and faith from Gesshu to Engetsu. |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 658
研究方法 658
善海『行信杞憂弁』について 659
円月『読行信杞憂弁』について 659
円月の行信論における善海の影響 660
おわりに 661 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.65.2_658 |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 32 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
