 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sophistry In and As Its Course |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Liberman, Kenneth (著)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
Argumentation
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2008 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 59 - 70 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
https://link.springer.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | Tibetan debating; Ethnomethodology; Sophistry; Philosophy |
|---|
| 摘要 | Although sophistry has been characterized as separable from real philosophy, formal analysis does not work without it and one cannot always identify just where philosophy leaves off and sophistry begins. Whether sophistry offers anything to thinking reason has to do with what parties in dialogue do with sophistries. Sophistries can close down or open up philosophical perspectives, depending on the local work that sophistic strategies accomplish. Such local work of philosophers is rarely available to analyses of docile texts, but they can be furthered by ethnomethodological studies of illustrative philosophical argumentation presented and analyzed in videotaped format. |
|---|
| ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9070-y |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 144 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
