 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『菩薩地』「真実義品」におけるvastumātraの意味：有と無との対論=The Meaning of vastumātra in the Tattvārtha Chapter of the Bodhisattvabhūmi: An Argument between Existence and Non-existence |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
桑月一仁 (著)=Kuwatsuki, Kazuhito (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2018.03.20 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 821 - 818 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | 菩薩地; 真実義品; vastumātra; prajñaptimātra; tathatāmātra |
|---|
| 摘要 | The Tattvārtha chapter of the Bodhisattvabhūmi uses the term prajñaptimātra to deny samāropa, and the term vastumātra to deny apavāda. Through a comparison of both terms, I point out that the meaning of mātra in the compound vastu-mātra is a denial of non-existence as the basis of designation, and an acceptance of its existence. When samāropa and apavāda are denied by prajñaptimātra and vastumātra, it is proved that all phenomena have an inexpressible intrinsic nature.Originally vastu was seen to have two meanings, “the basis of designation” and “existence of ultimate reality.” Only when used as a restriction of the “inexpressible” (nirabhilāpya) is vastu seen to take the meaning of “existence of ultimate reality,” yet I point out that originally the word vastu does not have the meaning of “existence of ultimate reality.” |
|---|
| 目次 | はじめに 821
1. 増益を否定する文脈に見られる prajñaptimātra 821
2. 損減を否定する文脈に見られる vastumātra 820
3. vastumātra と prajñaptimātra 819
4. vastu には二つの側面があるのか 819
おわりに 818 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_821 |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 631 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2022.08.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.04 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
