 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
元暁の出家年齢と義湘の出家年齢=The Ordination Age of Wŏnhyo and Ŭisang |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
愛宕邦康 (著)=Atago, Kuniyasu (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2020.12.25 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 234 - 241 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | 元暁; 義湘; 『三国遺事』; 『誓幢和上塔碑』; 『宋高僧伝』 |
|---|
| 摘要 | After the Second World War, studies on Silla Buddhism developed in Japan and South Korea without any interaction between scholars of the two countries, until diplomatic relations were established with the signing of the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea in 1965. Consequences of this lack of interaction spanning two decades have still not been overcome. The difference in dominant views on when Wŏnhyo 元暁 (617–686) and Ŭisang 義湘 (625–702) were ordained is a case in point. This paper focuses on three views prevalent in Japan: that Wŏnhyo was ordained at the age of 29; that he was ordained around the age of 15; and that Ŭisang was ordained at the age of 20. Analyses of these views reveal that they are based on inadequate basic research, such as misreading and omissions in reading classical Chinese text. This makes it clear why all three views have been denied as groundless in Korea. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一 問題の所在 234
二 元暁二十九歳皇龍寺出家説 234
三 元暁十五歳前後出家説 236
四 義湘二十歳出家説 237
五 元暁の幼名は誓幢か 238 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_234 |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 133 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2022.10.05 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.05 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
