網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
『瑩山清規』諸本の「回向文」の構成について=The Structure of “Merit-Transfer Invocations” in Keizan’s Monastic Regulations Manuscripts
作者 秋津秀彰 (著)=Akitsu, Hideaki (au.)
出處題名 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
卷期v.70 n.1 (總號=n.155)
出版日期2021.12.20
頁次213 - 218
出版者日本印度学仏教学会
出版者網址 http://www.jaibs.jp/
出版地東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言日文=Japanese
關鍵詞瑩山紹瑾禅師; 禅林寺本; 太容梵清; 正法清規
摘要This paper examines the “merit-transfer invocations” (ekōmon回向文) compiled in Keizan’s Monastic Regulations (Keizan Shingi瑩山清規). The Monastic Regulations composed by Keizan Jōkin瑩山紹瑾(1264-1325) exist in multiple copies, which differ in terms of the number and type of merit-transfer invocations compiled. This paper examines three primary sources: the Zenrin-ji copy禅林寺本, the manuscripts edited by Bonsei梵清本, and the Shōbō-shingi正法清規. The most common portion of the three, the merit-transfer invocations in these sources, is referred to as the “first half,” and the part present in the manuscripts edited by Bonsei and in the Shōbō-shingi, but completely absent from the Zenrin-ji copy, is referred to as the “second half.”

In recent years, based on the Zenrin-ji copy, questions have been raised whether the “second half” even existed at the time that Keizan was compiling the manuscripts. In response, based on the results of an examination of four of the merit-transfer invocations, this paper reaches the following conclusions:

Both the copies edited by Bonsei and the Shōbō-shingi separately refer to a common original manuscript that included the “second half.” Therefore, there is no relation of direct reference between the two. Furthermore, this common original manuscript may correspond to the shōhon (authentic copy正本) recorded in comparative revisions of the Zenrin-ji copy.

In terms of the “second half” rituals and merit-transfer invocations, the origin of which is attributed to Keizan, this paper shows that the upper limits of compilation in Keizan’s Monastic Regulations may also be found in Keizan. Therefore, the original form of Keizan’s Monastic Regulations should not be sought in the Zenrin-ji copy alone but must be reconsidered through a reexamination, comparison, and evaluation of all the manuscripts.
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.1_213
點閱次數145
建檔日期2023.01.05
更新日期2023.01.05










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
661561

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽