網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
義寂と勝莊の『梵網経』註釈の比較=A Comparison of the Fanwang jing Commentaries of Ŭijŏk and Sŭngjang
作者 法長=李忠煥
出處題名 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
卷期v.70 n.2 (總號=n.156)
出版日期2022.03.23
頁次878 - 871
出版者日本印度学仏教学会
出版者網址 http://www.jaibs.jp/
出版地東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言日文=Japanese
關鍵詞梵網経; 義寂; 勝莊; 機根論; 瑜伽論
摘要Ŭijŏk 義寂 and Sŭngjang 勝莊 both wrote Fanwang jing 梵網経 commentaries quoting the Yogācārabhūmi 瑜伽師地論. However, there is a decisive difference between them in the purpose of such quotations. Ŭijŏk quoted the Yogācārabhūmi in order to expound the Fanwang jing, but Sŭngjang commented on the Yogācārabhūmi itself. These differences are also related to their respective understandings of the precepts戒律. Ŭijŏk held the position that all sentient beings possess buddha-nature一切衆生悉有仏性. For Sŭngjang, the capacity機根 of beings is determined through the five gotra theory五性各別. This is also related to the three categories of pure precepts三聚浄戒. If one holds the five gotra theory, there is a difference in the interpretation of the precepts that are aimed at the improvement of other beings 摂衆生戒. The three categories of pure precepts is an idea not originally contained in the Fanwang jing. However, it was quoted by many commentators after Zhiyi智顗. The five gotra theory is different from the idea of saving all the people that the Fanwang jing emphasizes. In this study, I compare the Fanwang jing commentaries of Ŭijŏk and Sŭngjang, and identify the reasons for those differences and the problems of interpretation.
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.2_878
點閱次數27
建檔日期2023.01.09
更新日期2023.01.09










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
662592

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽