This study aims to explore how to punish claimer of false opinion who has intention of splitting saṃgha in the Vinayapiṭaka. If a false opinion said by a bhikkhu is in danger of resulting in division of saṃgha, saṃgha attempts to advise him to give up his false opinion three times with kamma. Notwithstanding this advices, if the claimer will adheres to the false opinion, he is punished with saṃghādisesa from saṃgha. In kamma, the bhikkhu who is guilty of saṃghādisesa is deprived of his many rights as a bhikkhu, and has to live in confinement for a certain period. Moreover, he is under control of the 94 restrictions such as the prohibitions on imparting the full ordination and guidance, taking charge of a sāmaṇera and admonishing the bhikkhunīs. He is under control of many restrictions and is degraded to a lowest position in living of saṃgha. Those penalties is imposed on claimer of false opinion having no intention of splitting saṃgha in the same way. But, basically, there is a important differentiation between punishments of them. the bhikkhu who is guilty of saṃghādisesa can participate in uposatha and pavāraṇā, and share of anything be offered by believers, because he is not deprived of his position as bhikkhu.
目次
I. 서 론 276 II. 파승과 승잔죄 279 1. 승잔죄 제10.11조 279 2. 파승과 승잔죄 284 III. 별주 중의 행법 286 IV. 별주와 불공수의 관계 290 V. 결 론 295 . 영문초록 298
