|
|
|
|
Are Ethnocentric/Nationalist Buddhists Engaged Buddhists? Certainly Not. |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
King, Sallie B. (著)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
Journal of Buddhist Ethics
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.30 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2023 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 83 - 92 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
https://history.la.psu.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | University Park, PA, US |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | ahimsa; engaged Buddhism; human rights; Myanmar; Sri Lanka |
|---|
| 摘要 | This is a brief response to Donna Lynn Brown’s article, “Beyond Queen and King: Democratizing ‘Engaged Buddhism’,” (Journal of Buddhist Ethics Vol. 30, 2023) and indirectly to others who have argued that ethnocentric and/or
nationalist Buddhism could be a part of Engaged Buddhism. To this question, I will argue that this is not possible. Secondarily, I take up the question of the “oneness” of Engaged Buddhism. |
|---|
| 目次 | Abstract 83
Works Cited 91 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 174 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2023.05.26 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.05.29 |
|---|
|
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
