網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
Korea’s Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate: The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt’Ong (Kihwa)
作者 Muller, A. Charles (譯) ; Muller, A. Charles (引言)
出版日期2015.05
頁次192
出版者University of Hawaii Press
出版者網址 https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
出版地Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國]
叢書名Korean Classics Library: Philosophy and Religion
資料類型書籍=Book
使用語言英文=English
附註項A. Charles Muller is professor in the Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology at the University of Tokyo. His main work lies in the fields of Korean Buddhism, East Asian Yogācāra, East Asian classical lexicography, and online scholarly resource development.
關鍵詞Buddhist-Confucian debate; Neo-Confucianism; Sŏn; Kihwa; Chŏng Tojŏn; essence-function; ti-yong; c'he-yong; Chosŏn; Koryŏ
摘要This volume makes available in English the seminal treatises in Korea's greatest interreligious debate of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. On Mind, Material Force, and Principle and An Array of Critiques of Buddhism by Confucian statesman Chŏng Tojŏn (1342–1398) and Exposition of Orthodoxy by Sŏn monk Kihwa (1376–1433) are presented here with extensive annotation. A substantial introduction provides a summary and analysis of the philosophical positions of both Neo-Confucianism and Buddhism as well as a germane history of the interactions between these two traditions in East Asia, offering insight into religious tensions that persist to this day.

Translator A. Charles Muller shows how, from the time Confucianism and Buddhism met in China, these thought systems existed, along with Daoism, in a competing relationship that featured significant mutual influence. A confrontative situation eventually developed in China, wherein Confucian leaders began to criticize Buddhism. During the late-Koryŏ and early-Chosŏn periods in Korea, the Neo-Confucian polemic became the driving force in the movement to oust Buddhism from its position as Korea's state religion. In his essays, Chŏng drew together the gamut of arguments that had been made against Buddhism throughout its long history in Korea. Kihwa's essay met Neo-Confucian contentions with an articulate Buddhist response. Thus, in a rare moment in the history of religions, a true philosophical debate ensued.

This debate was made possible based upon the two religions' shared philosophical paradigm: essence-function (ch'e-yong). This traditional East Asian way of interpreting society, events, phenomena, human beings, and the world understands all things to have both essence and function, two contrasting yet wholly contiguous and mutually containing components. All three East Asian traditions took this as their underlying philosophical paradigm, and it is through this paradigm that they evaluated and criticized each other's doctrines and practices.

Specialists in philosophy, religion, and Korean studies will appreciate Muller's exploration of this pivotal moment in Korean intellectual history. Because it includes a broad overview of the interactive history of East Asian religions, this book can also serve as a general introduction to East Asian philosophical thought.
目次Front Matter
Copyright Page
Acknowledgments
Translator’s Introduction

Translations
On Mind, Material Force, and Principle (Simgiri p’yŏn): by Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong)
An Array of Critiques of Buddhism (Pulssi chappyŏn): by Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong)
Exposition of Orthodoxy (Hyŏnjŏng non): by Kihwa (Hamhŏ Tŭkt’ong)

End Matter
Appendix 1: Simgiri pyŏn 心氣理篇
Appendix 2: Pulssi chappyŏn 心氣理篇
Appendix 3: Hyŏnjŏng non 顯正論
Notes
Bibliography
Index
About the Translator
Production Notes
ISBN9780824853808 (hc); 9780824892647 (pbk)
相關書評
  1. Book Review: Korea's Great Buddhist-Confucian Debate: The Treatise of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) Translated by A. Charles Muller / Kim, Hwansoo (評論)
  2. Book Review: Korea's Great Buddhist–Confucian Debate: The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) Trans by A. Charles Muller / McBride, Richard D., II (評論)
  3. Book Review: Korea's Great Buddhist–Confucian Debate: The Treatises of Chŏng Tojŏn (Sambong) and Hamhŏ Tŭkt'ong (Kihwa) Translated by A. Charles Muller / McBride, Richard D., II (評論)
點閱次數165
建檔日期2023.08.10
更新日期2023.11.22










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
679414

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽