The sanctions for prohibited behavior in Vinaya texts are based on the precepts. It is, however, in the padabhājaniya (commentaries on the prātimokṣa) and the vinītaka (case-law sections) that these sanctions are further developed and explained. In the Vinayas, intention (the monk’s motivations while committing an act), action (the action that the monk carried out), and outcome (the effect of this action on others) are generally understood to be the three factors that affect the sanctioning principles. Intention is considered the most essential factor because a monk who has performed, without motivation, a negligent action is often declared innocent in the Vinayas. However, some scholars argue that the requirement of intention pertains only to misdemeanors, not to serious offenses, and is not an overriding factor. This article investigates the logic informing the sanctions concerning intention, action, and outcome in the vibhaṅgas for the four pārājikas, including the precepts, the padabhājaniya, and the vinītaka. It is shown that this principle of conviction in fact applies to serious offenses as well as misdemeanors, although there are exceptions, such as cases in which the monk is forced to commit adultery (by being raped), etc. Although the precepts and their associated sanctions vary considerably, this article argues that an underlying logic informs them. This paper provides a typology for these sanctions by investigating the four pārājikas of the Vinayas.
目次
Abstract 1 Keywords 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Sanction Patterns in the Four Pārājikas 2 2.1. Injunction against Sexual Intercourse 2 2.2. Stealing 4 2.3. Injunction against Murder 6 2.4. Injunction against Falsely Claiming Saintliness and Supernormal Achievement 7 3. Sanctions in the Vinayas 8 4. Is It Necessary for the Monk to Admit His Intention to Commit an Offense? 10 Notes 11 References 12 Primary Sources 12 Secondary Sources 12
