網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
南朝宋文明《道德義淵.自然道性》論述契機及其詮釋=The Discourse Opportunity and interpretation of Zirandaoxing in Daodeyiyuan by Song Wenming in Southern Dynasties
作者 劉鐔靖 =Liu,Tan-Ching
出處題名 臺灣宗教研究=Taiwan Journal of Religious Studies
卷期v.22 n.1
出版日期2023.06
頁次177 - 214
出版者台灣宗教學會=Taiwan Association for Religious Studies
出版地臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
關鍵詞《道德義淵》=profound of the Daode jing(Daode yiyuan); 〈自然道性〉=spontaneous Dao-nature(ziran Daoxing); 道性自然=spontaneity of Dao-nature(Daoxing ziran); 〈立神明成佛義記〉=Meaningful Record on the Establishment of the Spiritual Brillance to become a Buddha(Lishenming chengfo yiji); 宋文明=Song Wenming
摘要《道德經》「道法自然」、《河上公注》「道性自然」、陸修靜「自然因緣」、宋文明「自然道性」發展脈絡歷來為學者關注,並認為宋文明《道德義淵.自然道性》延續陸修靜舊說,置入道教文獻「道性」發展的脈絡。回顧學者成果,並未論述其成立契機。本文認為《道德義淵》應有其特定的論述契機與創意,或與神滅論爭後的漣漪—梁武帝〈立神明成佛義記〉相關,將由以下證成前述並論其創發:(一)探討「自然道性」的論述契機;(二)以《道德義淵.自然道性》探討宋文明的「道性」詮釋;(三)以「道教內部文獻的引用」、「體例的傳承與論述系統的差異」兩個視角論述作為敦煌寫本文獻系統《道德義淵》於道教內部系統的兩個意涵。

The development context of "the Dao as spontaneity" (Dao De Jing), "DaoxingZiran" (the Ho-shang Kung Commentaries), "Ziran causation shuo" ( Lu Xiu Jing ) and "Zirandaoxing" (Song Wen Ming) had been a topic of concern for scholars.Looking back on the scholar's achievements. Based on the Song Wenming "Zirandaoxing" (Daodeyiyuan), this article put the development of Daoist literature into the development of Daoism. It didn't not discuss the opportunity for its establishment. perhaps, it can be assumed that "Daodeyiyuan" should have its specific discussion opportunity and originality. This article believes that it may be related to "Li Shenming Cheng Fo Yi Ji" (Emperor Wu of the Liang Dynasty), which would be proved by the following and discuss its creation: (1) The opportunity of discussing "Zirandaoxing", (2) Based on "Zirandaoxing" to explore the interpretation of "Dao Xing" by Song Wen Ming ; (3) Discuss the two meanings of the Dunhuang manuscript system "Daodeyiyuan" in the internal system of Daoism from the two perspectives of "quotation of internal Daoist literature" and "inheritance of styles and differences in discourse system".
目次一、前言 178

二、宋文明「自然道性」的論述契機 180
(一)陸修靜因應「佛性說」成立〈自然因緣說〉(佚)180
(二)另一場論爭:神滅論爭的「佛性」漣漪 184

三、宋文明的「自然道性」詮釋 190
(一)立基《河注》釋「道法自然」(《道德經》)以述「道性」191
(二)建構「道性」與「善」的關係 194
(三)「通有」、「迴變」與「一切含識皆有道性」的提出 196

四、於道教內部系統的兩個意涵 199
(一)道教內部文獻的引用 200
(二)「道性」論述系統的差異與體例的傳承 202

五、結論 204

參考書目 207
ISSN20769458 (P)
點閱次數130
建檔日期2023.10.18
更新日期2023.10.23










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
684389

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽