 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Polemics of Passivity and Yuanwu’s Usage of It=負面詞彙的論辯及圓悟禪師對此詞彙的運用 |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Yu, Jimmy (著)=俞永峯 (au.)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies=中華佛學學報
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.36 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2023.08 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 31 - 71 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies=中華佛學研究所 |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | Chan Buddhism=禪宗; Dahui=大慧; Yuanwu=圓悟; Hongzhi=宏智; passivity=負面詞彙; Caodong=曹洞; Linji=臨濟; Japanese sectarian scholarship=日本宗學意識 |
|---|
| 摘要 | This paper argues that while there has been much scholarly advancement in the field of Southern Song dynasty Chan literature, the lens through which some scholars read Caodong Chan literature is still strikingly reminiscent of early Japanese sectarian biases that connect distinct Chan discursive motifs with specific lineages and institutions, even when there is little justification in the primary sources themselves. This paper proposes a reassessment of the supposed polemics between Caodong and Linji pedagogical styles by looking more broadly at different discourse records to appreciate the shared literary Chan motif of passivity during the Southern Song period and to disentangle these motifs from sectarian affiliations.
南宋禪學史已經有相當的學術進展，但某些學者在閱讀中國曹洞文獻時仍然含有早期日本禪學界的「宗學」主義之成見，將禪宗術語與宗派傳承連接起來，即使原文並無法證實。本文以所謂曹洞、臨濟二宗之間的辯論和教學風格為例，透過廣泛地檢閱禪宗語錄，來理清並重行評估南宋禪師們如何運用負面的禪宗術語，將這些詞彙從宗風和宗派連結的關係中脫離出來。
|
|---|
| 目次 | Abstract 31
Keywords 31
摘要 32
關鍵詞 32
Introduction 33
A False Caodong vs. Linji Dichotomy in Sectarian Scholarship 34
Western Scholars’ Assessment of the Two Traditions 37
Caricatures of Passivity 40
Yuanwu’s Usage of Passivity together with the Critical Phrase Method 41
Other Masters’ Admonition against Passivity 61
Conclusion 63
References 68
|
|---|
| ISSN | 23132000 (P); 23132019 (E) |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 35 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2023.12.18 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.12.18 |
|---|
 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
